View Full Version : Is the FAST LSX worth it for all bolt-on cars?
Cobraeater
02-16-2004, 11:48 PM
I have all the bolt-ons, and after reading TSP's test and Thunder's Racing LS1 to LSX test I'm not sure I should buy it. The LSX looks definetly worth it for the larger than stock ci setups, and the extreme h/c setups with the 90mm tb and intake, but what about the bolt-on and cam only guys? :huh:
With the LS6 intake I gained 7hp and 10torque over the LS1 with bolt-ons, but what would the LSX do? I know anybody with the stock exhaust manifolds and stock cats should skip the LSX based on TSP's results.:bashhead:
wannafbody
02-17-2004, 01:59 AM
i'd say not-$750 is a lot for maybe 10 hp
Darkhalf
02-17-2004, 02:36 AM
Yeah I agree I think the bigger cube motors will show the most gains.
bRa_DeN
02-17-2004, 03:22 AM
i would just stick with your ls6 intake, unless like you stated you plan on changin cubes:cool:
Cobraeater
02-17-2004, 07:14 AM
Originally posted by Darkhalf
Yeah I agree I think the bigger cube motors will show the most gains.
I don't know LG and two other guys have tested the LSX on head/cam cars and got 15-20rwhp, so it looks worth it to me on a 346ci motor.
PC PaiN
02-17-2004, 08:04 AM
It all depends on setup and if you want to squeeze every little turd of a HP out of the motor. I personally don't think it's proven its cost yet.
Xerxes
02-17-2004, 12:36 PM
I think someone tested one with the 90 MM TB and picked up around 18-20RWHP on a 346. IMHO, it's only worth it if you pick up the matching TB at the same time.
Constrictor
02-17-2004, 02:12 PM
If you already have the LS6 intake and think you can sell it to someone for maybe $300 or something, then perhaps it would be worth it. Especially if you thought about heads/cam or maybe cam only in the future.
Packy
02-17-2004, 04:03 PM
I would say save your money for better flowing heads and a cam! Then just have the stock throttlebody ported!:D
bRa_DeN
02-17-2004, 04:27 PM
Originally posted by Packy
I would say save your money for better flowing heads and a cam! Then just have the stock throttlebody ported!:D
exactly right;)
5.7 LS1 SS
02-17-2004, 07:27 PM
Originally posted by Packy
I would say save your money for better flowing heads and a cam! Then just have the stock throttlebody ported!:D
Couldn't have said it any better
bRa_DeN
02-17-2004, 10:05 PM
now i can see the lsx intake being very worthwhile if you spraying on forged internals, with that direct-port system hook up they have;)
JohnnyLS2
02-18-2004, 09:08 AM
Well, I have a heads/cam car and plan on getting the LSX intake manifold in the future, I'll make sure to fill you guys in.. :)
1CAMWNDR
02-18-2004, 02:46 PM
Originally posted by Packy
I would say save your money for better flowing heads and a cam! Then just have the stock throttlebody ported!:D
:werd: :stupid:
Unless you have a serious effort heads and cam car I doubt it will be worth it.
Or if you have the Direct Port Nitrous like stated above. I don't see the 90 mm version doing a damn thing for a 346 inch car.
NaSSty01
02-18-2004, 04:54 PM
Originally posted by Packy
I would say save your money for better flowing heads and a cam! Then just have the stock throttlebody ported!:D
:stupid:
If anything, you should get a cam. If you have the cash, pickup a set of heads too.
I need to start searching. I've just about got the wife talked into letting me have the entire tax return for mods.
11.doh's or bust!
:yay:
wannafbody
02-20-2004, 03:53 AM
for a car set up with AFR heads that could theoretically flow 330plus cfm and a 230 plus duration cam the LSX with a 90mm TB would probably show a 20-25 HP gain over the LS6 but youd better have deep pockets
if you plan on doing more stuff in the future then i would get it or like someone else said, if you are trying to squeeze every ounce of power out then i would do it.
dont forget that the lsx is portable and as far as i know not testers have portmatch the setup. yes, its expensive, but port matched, bigger TB, and a nice h/c or even cam'd/bolt on the gains would be nice.
for now though i'll stick with my ls6 and pick up an s2/s3 down the line.
2000 Tran Zam
02-21-2004, 02:56 AM
well i have the intake on my car now, i have to finish fixing my exhuast leak, but hopefully ill be able to get a dyno tune this next week or weekend. Mods in sig.
2000 Tran Zam
02-21-2004, 02:58 AM
ok, apparentely sig isnt working for some reason, so here it is:
2000 Ws6 Trans Am
Mods: Ftra, direct flo, iridium plugs, taylor wires, Pacesetter headers and oryp, borla wide open, S3 TB, LS1 Edit, Katech Stage 2 heads/ TR 224 112 lsa cam package, LSX intake manifold, ZR1 replica rims 17x11 and 17x9.5 on 315 nitto DR, Spec 3 clutch.
Suspension: Random Tech. Adj. torque arm, BMR tubular LCA's, BMR adj. panhard bar.
mics2fbodies
02-21-2004, 09:17 PM
Originally posted by wannafbody
for a car set up with AFR heads that could theoretically flow 330plus cfm and a 230 plus duration cam the LSX with a 90mm TB would probably show a 20-25 HP gain over the LS6 but youd better have deep pockets
Well I would be interested in seeing this because I bet it dosen't.
JCS30TH
02-23-2004, 01:09 AM
Has anyone put this manifold on a stock ls1 and dyno'd? I think the claim of 20hp over stock is a little wishful:o
Originally posted by JCS30TH
Has anyone put this manifold on a stock ls1 and dyno'd? I think the claim of 20hp over stock is a little wishful:o
not bone stock but a typical setup
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showpost.php?p=995513&postcount=6
JCS30TH
02-23-2004, 05:43 AM
Damn 20 hp out the back. With a lid and that intake, seems like you would be putting out almost 40 HP at the crank over stock?
So a typical LS1 with a lid and that intake would be around 380 at the crank? I might have to look into this thing....
Cobraeater
02-23-2004, 10:59 PM
Here's a post from ls1tech about the gains with full bolt-ons.
Tested one at the shop on a stock internals car, full bolt ons. Before LSX power was 350/367. After LSX was 350/370. Disappointing to say the least. Customer wanted his LS6 intake put back on. Can't say I blame him.
The car was a 2002 SS with about 4000 miles on the clock. Pulley, Jet Hot headers, loudmouth, lid, and no cats,etc.
:(
Here's the link.
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=131732&page=2
2000 Tran Zam
02-23-2004, 11:05 PM
Ya, but look at this one with the same cam that i have. i dont know what heads it has, but ive got stage 2 heads also, so i would hope for something similar...
two LSX dynos on our dyno
1) Heads/Cam, 224/224, everything, 419 rwhp/ 405 rwtq /w LS6
After LSX 440 rwhp/ 420 rwtq
2) Patriot 5.3 Stg2 heads, TSP 231/237 cam, everything car - 405 rwhp /w ls6
after LSX 420 rwhp
DVST8OR
02-24-2004, 07:51 PM
I think that it is really going to take some internal modifications for this thing to show its colors, i.e. heads, cam, or both.
This intake is also a star for the nitrous crowd because it has provisions for direct port.
I defenitely see good gains from a H/C car and getting the intake port matched, which is what I will do if I get this intake.
Durien512
02-25-2004, 01:32 AM
lets see what the ls2 does...and if it does something..the lsx's price should drop
Originally posted by Durien512
lets see what the ls2 does...and if it does something..the lsx's price should drop
agreed, i see the ls2 comming in cheaper, but that still leaves you with the need for a 90mm TB, which is gonna cost a pretty penny.
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.