PDA

View Full Version : My Turbo 3.8 Camaro! (New Pics Added!)


Teufel Hunden
07-18-2004, 03:30 AM
Dyno numbers will be coming as soon as i get a new clutch ;)

Pics in no particular order.

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/samkit5.jpg

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/samkit2.jpg

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/samkit3.jpg

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/samsidemas.jpg

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/samunder1.jpg

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/samfrontup.jpg

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/sambackforward.jpg

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/samfrontback.jpg

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/samtop.jpg

:D

Scotty
07-18-2004, 05:29 AM
Looking great!!!! :cool:

Any pics of the car itself?

Teufel Hunden
07-18-2004, 05:40 AM
The white one :D

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/Cars1.jpg

Teufel Hunden
07-19-2004, 04:00 AM
Mustang Dyno Numbers: at 7psi,

287rwhp
367rwtq

The stock clutch won't let me turn the boost past 7psi. More numbers and some track times to come soon!

99Camaro99
07-19-2004, 05:04 PM
according to those numbers that motor is all low end and nothing up top. I don't think just giving more air is going to help that. Maybe try a different cam?? Either way good numbers...and why do you have 10psi mentioned in your sig if you cannot support it? ;)

Teufel Hunden
07-19-2004, 05:24 PM
Originally posted by 99Camaro99
according to those numbers that motor is all low end and nothing up top. I don't think just giving more air is going to help that. Maybe try a different cam?? Either way good numbers...and why do you have 10psi mentioned in your sig if you cannot support it? ;)

I thank you for your opinion, but you're far from correct. My car really shines up top, and is only moderately fast through first gear. The turbo i selected for my car is one that provides plenty of top end performance... so trust me, my car has PLENTY up top. The stock cam for these cars is a good turbo cam and will support a good amount of power; it's the heads that need work. I have 10psi in my sig because the car did support that, but i made the mistake of driving around for a while at that pressure with the stock clutch instead of immediately putting it on the dyno. Now the clutch is very tired and doesn't like 4th gear with more boost than 7psi.

99Camaro99
07-19-2004, 06:55 PM
let me rephrase...287rwhp is a good amount of "top end" but when you have 367rwtq I expect your rwhp to be around 330/340ish at least. Seems like that torque starts dropping as it approaches good 'ol 5252rpms :) Either way that's nice...if I actually did not have a lemon V6 I may have attempted what you did.

Scotty
07-19-2004, 07:27 PM
Those are amazing numbers! I don't really know how the turbos tend to perform, but is it normal to have such a difference between you HP and TQ numbers?

Either way, the car looks and seems to perform great! Any chance you'll be able to get us some track numbers soon? :cool:

pontiacbird04
07-21-2004, 05:46 AM
how much did that turbo cost you??? and what other mods do you have?

94camarof1
08-03-2004, 02:31 AM
pretty cool set up :cool:

panman79
08-07-2004, 10:27 PM
BADASS

pawn65
08-09-2004, 01:51 PM
his setup was probably some where around 3000.00

Teufel Hunden
08-12-2004, 02:15 AM
Here's a couple engine bay shots!

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/EngineBay+001.jpg

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/EngineBay+002.jpg

http://ourworld.cs.com/TeufelHundenM198/EngineBay+003.jpg

:cool: