View Full Version : Automobile magazine: G8 weighs...
1badls2goat
03-17-2007, 09:47 PM
damn it. according the april issue of automobile mag, the G8 weighs 3995 lbs :dammit:
DrFrag
03-17-2007, 09:47 PM
thats a huge bitch!
CT Morgan
03-17-2007, 09:51 PM
How did you figure (or hope) it would weigh much less than that?
It's a 4 door sedan with a big engine... not a 2 door racing coupe. :dunno: It is amazing that cars this heavy and with this much horsepower can get anything close to decent gas mileage.
MapleRed
03-17-2007, 09:55 PM
The 300/Charger weigh around 4200 lbs. w/ the Hemi. 3995 lbs really isn't a surprise. :shrug:
Harmon Rabb
03-17-2007, 10:03 PM
this shocks who? :think:
triggerjerk
03-17-2007, 10:19 PM
So lets guestimate the Camaro's weight.
Hopefully it'll get composite front fenders and hood:xfings:
Something tells me not to hold my breath though:(
MapleRed
03-17-2007, 10:23 PM
Originally posted by triggerjerk
So lets guestimate the Camaro's weight.
Hopefully it'll get composite front fenders and hood:xfings:
Something tells me not to hold my breath though:(
A mid-level V8 Camaro might weigh around 3600 lbs. :shrug:
George El Dorado
03-17-2007, 10:26 PM
Originally posted by pass dimeo
thats a huge bitch!
Not these days.
ChillPhatCat
03-17-2007, 10:32 PM
Originally posted by triggerjerk
So lets guestimate the Camaro's weight.
Hopefully it'll get composite front fenders and hood:xfings:
Something tells me not to hold my breath though:(
It got lots of fiberglass last time around :shrug:
triggerjerk
03-17-2007, 10:41 PM
Originally posted by ChillPhatCat
It got lots of fiberglass last time around :shrug:
True that.
If the factory doesn't step up, maybe the aftermarket will? :dunno:
Jack Daniels
03-17-2007, 10:47 PM
Originally posted by Berman
this shocks who? :think:
Not me.
1badls2goat
03-17-2007, 10:52 PM
:shrug: I guess I was just hoping it would be around 3700-3800 like the GTO, so that with some weight reduction it can weigh around 3500, but now I guess w/weight reduction, it'll still be a boat like the GTO
1badls2goat
03-17-2007, 10:53 PM
But the GXP G8 will take care of the extra weight :yup: LS3
kasim
03-17-2007, 11:02 PM
i am surpised .... i thought it was gonna weigh 3994lbs
:ripped:
1badls2goat
03-17-2007, 11:10 PM
Originally posted by kasim
i am surpised .... i thought it was gonna weigh 3994lbs
:ripped:
:dammit: :rolleyes:
Checkmate
03-17-2007, 11:52 PM
Originally posted by MapleRed
A mid-level V8 Camaro might weigh around 3600 lbs. :shrug:
target weight of the camaro is 3800, so anything south of IMO is out of the question. ;)
1badls2goat
03-18-2007, 12:09 AM
^what kind of pony car weighs 3800 lbs???? :dammit: fuck all these luxo options
Harmon Rabb
03-18-2007, 12:09 AM
Originally posted by 1badls2goat
:shrug: I guess I was just hoping it would be around 3700-3800 like the GTO, so that with some weight reduction it can weigh around 3500, but now I guess w/weight reduction, it'll still be a boat like the GTO
of course it's going to be a boat. it's a fullsize 4-door car :lol:
wtf is wrong with you people who want the G8 to be some tiny corolla sized car? it's supposed to be a BIG, v8, rwd car like a 300C.
1badls2goat
03-18-2007, 12:15 AM
never said i wanted it to be like a corolla. obviously i was hoping for it to be a relatively light full-size sedan...3700 lbs would be a perfectly atainable weight for a fullsize sedan IMO...
Kata Skopos
03-18-2007, 12:18 AM
Originally posted by Checkmate
target weight of the camaro is 3800, so anything south of IMO is out of the question. ;)
and whered you hear this?
the GT500 is 3950 iirc and that has a 300lbs heavier motor
Harmon Rabb
03-18-2007, 12:19 AM
Originally posted by 1badls2goat
never said i wanted it to be like a corolla. obviously i was hoping for it to be a relatively light full-size sedan...3700 lbs would be a perfectly atainable weight for a fullsize sedan IMO...
i'm sorry but i'd rather a fullsize sedan weigh an extra 200lbs if it means better crash ratings, a more solid feeling and more quiet riding cabin, etc.
Cobra Commander
03-18-2007, 12:39 AM
lol, crash ratings
MapleRed
03-18-2007, 12:47 AM
Originally posted by Berman
of course it's going to be a boat. it's a fullsize 4-door car :lol:
wtf is wrong with you people who want the G8 to be some tiny corolla sized car? it's supposed to be a BIG, v8, rwd car like a 300C.
:werd:
Since when do full-size, fully loaded RWD V8 cars weigh as much as pony cars? :rolleyes:
MapleRed
03-18-2007, 12:48 AM
Originally posted by Checkmate
target weight of the camaro is 3800, so anything south of IMO is out of the question. ;)
I heard about that. I doubt target weight for the mid-level model is that high though? I could maybe see a top model weighing that much.
ULTIMTEORANGESS
03-18-2007, 12:48 AM
i dont see what a shock this is. isnt it supposed to be a luxury car or geared towards that?
MapleRed
03-18-2007, 12:50 AM
Originally posted by ULTIMTEORANGESS
i dont see what a shock this is. isnt it supposed to be a luxury car or geared towards that?
Think Chrysler LX cars. :yup:
Originally posted by ULTIMTEORANGESS
i dont see what a shock this is. isnt it supposed to be a luxury car or geared towards that?
It's a performance sedan, not luxury.
Pontiac doesn't really do luxury vehicles.
Element
03-18-2007, 01:04 AM
It's a sedan, not a pony car, as has been said.
Lighter weight = less options, and probably a worse score in crash test ratings. I don't see what's so hard to understand about it. Pontiac stated, quite a bit ago, that they're going to be the GM division that targets BMW. That means a heavy car, simply due to everything necessary for a plush, comfortable car.
Element
03-18-2007, 01:06 AM
Originally posted by Darth Plagueis
lol, crash ratings
Yes, because in a daily driver, I DO want the peace of mind in knowing a VW Bug isn't going to rip my car in half.
CT Morgan
03-18-2007, 01:11 AM
Originally posted by Element
Yes, because in a daily driver, I DO want the peace of mind in knowing a VW Bug isn't going to rip my car in half.
LOL, damn good point!!!
Cobra Commander
03-18-2007, 01:12 AM
Originally posted by Element
Yes, because in a daily driver, I DO want the peace of mind in knowing a VW Bug isn't going to rip my car in half.
roll cage :deal:
CT Morgan
03-18-2007, 01:12 AM
Originally posted by 1badls2goat
never said i wanted it to be like a corolla. obviously i was hoping for it to be a relatively light full-size sedan...3700 lbs would be a perfectly atainable weight for a fullsize sedan IMO...
Not with today's safety standards and consumer option requirements. :( 3,700 would only be 100 lbs heavier than the average f-body... no way in hell that's going to happen.
CT Morgan
03-18-2007, 01:14 AM
Originally posted by Darth Plagueis
roll cage :deal:
I'm sure you know as well as anyone that a roll cage without a driver wearing a helmet and a 5 point is more dangerous than nothing at all. It's a great option for scrambling your brains in an accident otherwise.
Cobra Commander
03-18-2007, 01:16 AM
Originally posted by CT Morgan
I'm sure you know as well as anyone that a roll cage without a driver wearing a helmet and a 5 point is more dangerous than nothing at all. It's a great option for scrambling your brains in an accident otherwise.
I was joking, but seriously, I don't think crash ratings have ever factored into a vehicle purchase of mine, ever. The thought just never crossed my mind.
CT Morgan
03-18-2007, 01:17 AM
Originally posted by Darth Plagueis
I was joking, but seriously, I don't think crash ratings have ever factored into a vehicle purchase of mine, ever.
Oh I'm with ya. But crash ratings do drive the masses out there. It's never something I've considered either... whether I should or not. :o
1badls2goat
03-18-2007, 01:18 AM
this luxo/crash rating stuff isn't always applicable IMO...the 07 g35 sedan is a luxo/sporty sedan and it weighs 3500 lbs, and 3700lbs if AWD. It's probably as safe as, if not safer than, the G8 will be. Sure the G8 has a bigger engine...the VQ weighs about 380 lbs and the L76 weighs less than 450 lbs...so there really shouldn't be a large difference.
CT Morgan
03-18-2007, 01:20 AM
Originally posted by 1badls2goat
this luxo/crash rating stuff isn't always applicable IMO...the 07 g35 sedan is a luxo/sporty sedan and it weighs 3500 lbs, and 3700lbs if AWD. It's probably as safe as, if not safer than, the G8 will be. Sure the G8 has a bigger engine...the VQ weighs about 380 lbs and the L76 weighs less than 450 lbs...so there really shouldn't be a large difference.
It seems like the G8 will be a bit bigger than the G35 to me, but I could be completely wrong on that one. :dunno:
Originally posted by Darth Plagueis
I was joking, but seriously, I don't think crash ratings have ever factored into a vehicle purchase of mine, ever. The thought just never crossed my mind.
...and do you think you are a good representation of the target demographic for the car?
Hell, do you think you are a good representation of the target demographic for ANY new car? :spit:
1badls2goat
03-18-2007, 01:20 AM
Originally posted by CT Morgan
no way in hell that's going to happen.
dude the g35 coupe weighs 3300 and the sedan is 3500 lbs. They're both safer than you could imagine (6 airbags, drop-away engine at high-speed collisions, etc. etc.)
CT Morgan
03-18-2007, 01:21 AM
Originally posted by 1badls2goat
dude the g35 coupe weighs 3300 and the sedan is 3500 lbs. They're both safer than you could imagine (6 airbags, drop-away engine at high-speed collisions, etc. etc.)
Yeah, but Nissan / Infiniti is not GM. You've got to compare it to GM's legacy imho.
1badls2goat
03-18-2007, 01:24 AM
Originally posted by CT Morgan
It seems like the G8 will be a bit bigger than the G35 to me, but I could be completely wrong on that one. :dunno:
the 07 G35 is a pretty big sedan, IMO. Shorter by nine inches but that doesn't always have to make a difference...hell they could use less heavy materials in the cabin (doesn't always mean less insulation), for example and probably reduce weight by about 50 lbs, and then they could cut some more weight by using lighter exhaust pipes or something like that--GM has always been known for cutting corners--why not do that here and end up with a better performing semi-luxo sport sedan?
ChillPhatCat
03-18-2007, 01:25 AM
Originally posted by CT Morgan
Not with today's safety standards and consumer option requirements. :( 3,700 would only be 100 lbs heavier than the average f-body... no way in hell that's going to happen.
Bah, mine doesn't even top 3,300 lbs :p
ULTIMTEORANGESS
03-18-2007, 01:27 AM
Originally posted by Boz
...and do you think you are a good representation of the target demographic for the car?
Hell, do you think you are a good representation of the target demographic for ANY new car? :spit:
so true. :lol:
CT Morgan
03-18-2007, 01:37 AM
Originally posted by ChillPhatCat
Bah, mine doesn't even top 3,300 lbs :p
LOL, okay okay... 4th gen LS1 f-bodies... damn details. :p
CT Morgan
03-18-2007, 01:39 AM
Originally posted by 1badls2goat
the 07 G35 is a pretty big sedan, IMO. Shorter by nine inches but that doesn't always have to make a difference...hell they could use less heavy materials in the cabin (doesn't always mean less insulation), for example and probably reduce weight by about 50 lbs, and then they could cut some more weight by using lighter exhaust pipes or something like that--GM has always been known for cutting corners--why not do that here and end up with a better performing semi-luxo sport sedan?
Eh, GM is known for cutting corners for cost savings... not necessarily weight savings. In fact cheaper materials could cause the weight increase.
I still think at ~ 4,000 lbs it will be a great car. I just hope it's easy to "up tune" the engine to normal LS2 standards rather than living with that detuned crap. :squint:
Element
03-18-2007, 01:42 AM
Originally posted by Darth Plagueis
roll cage :deal:
Don't know how a roll cage would fare against a side impact at 50mph, but I can't imagine it would be good.
Can you see the average person trying to get out of a car with a cage? :lol: They'd wind up breaking something.
1badls2goat
03-18-2007, 01:51 AM
Originally posted by CT Morgan
Eh, GM is known for cutting corners for cost savings... not necessarily weight savings. In fact cheaper materials could cause the weight increase.
I still think at ~ 4,000 lbs it will be a great car. I just hope it's easy to "up tune" the engine to normal LS2 standards rather than living with that detuned crap. :squint:
it isn't the tune that's mainly responsible for less hp.
It has better flowing heads than the LS2, in fact, but it has a smaller cam so it makes less horsepower. With a stock LS2 cam, it'd make around 450 hp. With an insane cam, who knows, but the numbers would be insane.
GMCtrk
03-18-2007, 02:05 AM
:jerkit:
This is a sedan, not a fucking corvette.
WCFields
03-18-2007, 02:07 AM
Originally posted by CT Morgan
Not with today's safety standards and consumer option requirements. :( 3,700 would only be 100 lbs heavier than the average f-body... no way in hell that's going to happen. Ummm...my 2001 SS w/ auto trans weighed in at 3380, a manual would be a bit lighter even.
1badls2goat
03-18-2007, 02:08 AM
Originally posted by GMCtrk
:jerkit:
This is a sedan, not a fucking corvette.
:spot: what a productive contribution.
ChillPhatCat
03-18-2007, 02:13 AM
I just hope the Gubment doesn't ruin the 2009 Camaro by implementing a bunch of last minute changes to crash standards... it's gonna be a damn safe car as it is.
Get Shorty
03-18-2007, 02:58 AM
Originally posted by CT Morgan
I still think at ~ 4,000 lbs it will be a great car. I just hope it's easy to "up tune" the engine to normal LS2 standards rather than living with that detuned crap. :squint:
It has a ridiculously restrictive intake. Swapping that out yields a nice horsepower increase.
http://g8gt.com/attachments/180d1171861526-pipedyno.jpg
Lots of install pictures here on a Holden L76.
http://g8gt.com/t212/
CT Morgan
03-18-2007, 03:11 AM
Originally posted by WhiteLightn
Ummm...my 2001 SS w/ auto trans weighed in at 3380, a manual would be a bit lighter even.
Both my 4th gen LS1 WS6's were ~ 3,600 in stock trim. Formulas and Z28's come in a little lighter, but I was speaking of averages. I think GM's dry curb weight on the Camaro was about 3,400. We're nit-picking here a little though. ;)
CT Morgan
03-18-2007, 03:11 AM
Originally posted by Get Shorty
It has a ridiculously restrictive intake. Swapping that out yields a nice horsepower increase.
http://g8gt.com/attachments/180d1171861526-pipedyno.jpg
Lots of install pictures here on a Holden L76.
http://g8gt.com/t212/
Damn good to know!
absolom
03-18-2007, 03:32 AM
lol, that's heavier than my cobra vert
:o
i still laugh at the people who thing the camaro is gonna be any sort of lightweight
ULTIMTEORANGESS
03-18-2007, 03:35 AM
Originally posted by absolom
lol, that's heavier than my cobra vert
:o
i still laugh at the people who thing the camaro is gonna be any sort of lightweight
why shouldnt it be heavier than your conv. cobra? its a 4 dr. sedan with a v8.
Get Shorty
03-18-2007, 03:37 AM
Originally posted by CT Morgan
Damn good to know!
That dyno graph could include a tune... I really have no way of knowing.
absolom
03-18-2007, 03:44 AM
Originally posted by ULTIMTEORANGESS
why shouldnt it be heavier than your conv. cobra? its a 4 dr. sedan with a v8.
because my car is a heavy bitch
:lol:
ULTIMTEORANGESS
03-18-2007, 03:46 AM
Originally posted by absolom
because my car is a heavy bitch
:lol:
fair enough. :rotfl:
Firehawk
03-18-2007, 04:15 AM
Was this a "test weight" as in with driver and equipment?
Sir Ringo
03-18-2007, 05:10 AM
Originally posted by Berman
of course it's going to be a boat. it's a fullsize 4-door car :lol:
wtf is wrong with you people who want the G8 to be some tiny corolla sized car? it's supposed to be a BIG, v8, rwd car like a 300C.
:werd:
Seems perfectly normal to me.
Checkmate
03-18-2007, 05:11 AM
Originally posted by needcash
and whered you hear this?
the GT500 is 3950 iirc and that has a 300lbs heavier motor
scott said it on this board but it was one of my threads so I'm sure it was pruned. God forbid anything car related be kept. :rolleyes:
Element
03-18-2007, 05:20 AM
Originally posted by ChillPhatCat
I just hope the Gubment doesn't ruin the 2009 Camaro by implementing a bunch of last minute changes to crash standards... it's gonna be a damn safe car as it is.
That's what I said in the last thread, but I got threadbanned because Scott Settlemier evidently didn't like the comment.
ULTIMTEORANGESS
03-18-2007, 05:22 AM
Originally posted by Checkmate
scott said it on this board but it was one of my threads so I'm sure it was pruned. God forbid anything car related be kept. :rolleyes:
http://www.ls2.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=7770355#post7770355
Sturmovik
03-18-2007, 06:20 AM
Considering the Camaro will be built on the same platform as the G8, you can bet there wont be big difference in weight. 150lbs at best.
BrightRedOne
03-18-2007, 06:33 AM
Originally posted by ULTIMTEORANGESS
http://www.ls2.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=7770355#post7770355
I absolutely love everything GM is doing right now. My entire family has owned GM vehicles for the last forty years. I have yet to see a new model that I have not liked, and the new Saturns are amazing. Keep it up, and GM is going to hand every foreign automaker its ass.
Wow it's a good thing he's no prophet, cause he'd be out of business pretty quick.
ULTIMTEORANGESS
03-18-2007, 07:01 AM
Originally posted by BrightRedOne
Wow it's a good thing he's no prophet, cause he'd be out of business pretty quick.
cant win em all.
MapleRed
03-18-2007, 07:51 AM
Originally posted by Checkmate
scott said it on this board but it was one of my threads so I'm sure it was pruned. God forbid anything car related be kept. :rolleyes:
He said it would not weigh over 3800 lbs in respone to someone that said it would. He did not give any specific weights and I did not take that as meaning that was the target weight.
Blade
03-18-2007, 08:33 AM
As expected
habib
03-18-2007, 12:16 PM
Originally posted by Checkmate
target weight of the camaro is 3800, so anything south of IMO is out of the question. ;) ugh
thats just horrid
Harmon Rabb
03-18-2007, 03:02 PM
Originally posted by 1badls2goat
dude the g35 coupe weighs 3300 and the sedan is 3500 lbs. They're both safer than you could imagine (6 airbags, drop-away engine at high-speed collisions, etc. etc.)
and the G35 sedan will be small compared to the G8 ;) the G35 is a small sedan. the G8 will be a large sedan.
Checkmate
03-18-2007, 04:11 PM
Originally posted by MapleRed
He said it would not weigh over 3800 lbs in respone to someone that said it would. He did not give any specific weights and I did not take that as meaning that was the target weight.
I took that as 3800 is the target. :shrug: We will see, in another year or so I guess. :(
What is the curb weight on the GTO, the real curb weight not what GM released.
explosionhobbit
03-18-2007, 04:27 PM
Originally posted by Checkmate
I took that as 3800 is the target. :shrug: We will see, in another year or so I guess. :(
What is the curb weight on the GTO, the real curb weight not what GM released.
i've heard 3725-3825. :shrug: my next car will have carbon fiber windows and tires for weight savings. :yup:
mrgto
03-18-2007, 04:53 PM
If they would utilze more aluminium or magnisium in the chasis the weight would go down. But I guess you can't have that and have cheaper prices....look at BMW's for instance they do use a lot of suspension components in aluminum.
Element
03-18-2007, 04:59 PM
Originally posted by mrgto
If they would utilze more aluminium or magnisium in the chasis the weight would go down. But I guess you can't have that and have cheaper prices....look at BMW's for instance they do use a lot of suspension components in aluminum.
You need a lot more aluminum to match the strength of steel, which invaribly increases both weight and price. Even if the aluminum part weighed less, it would be a lot larger. There was actually a good thread about that on Tech. Magnesium would be good, but if I remember correctly, that can mean some nasty fire if a wreck occurs, which would be a safety concern.
Cro-moly steel is where it's at, but you probably won't see much of that on a production car.
triggerjerk
03-18-2007, 09:49 PM
Z06 has an aluminum frame.
No problems there being "alot larger".
Geez, don't even malibus and some minivans have aluminum a arms?
Element
03-18-2007, 09:54 PM
Originally posted by triggerjerk
Z06 has an aluminum frame.
No problems there being "alot larger".
Geez, don't even malibus and some minivans have aluminum a arms?
It's 3+mm, vs the 1mm industry standard. It also required a hell of a lot of R&D work, as well as chaning the production assembly routine, meaning it is a hell of a lot more expensive. Somehow, I don't see GM doing that with their regular cars.
ChillPhatCat
03-18-2007, 10:31 PM
Originally posted by Element
You need a lot more aluminum to match the strength of steel, which invaribly increases both weight and price. Even if the aluminum part weighed less, it would be a lot larger. There was actually a good thread about that on Tech. Magnesium would be good, but if I remember correctly, that can mean some nasty fire if a wreck occurs, which would be a safety concern.
Cro-moly steel is where it's at, but you probably won't see much of that on a production car.
Magnesium only burns in extreemly thin strips or shavings, magnesium in block or thicker sheet form is very safe.
Nick7810
03-18-2007, 10:45 PM
Originally posted by WhiteLightn
Ummm...my 2001 SS w/ auto trans weighed in at 3380, a manual would be a bit lighter even.
I doubt that a 01 SS could pass the current safety requirements.
mrgto
03-18-2007, 10:56 PM
Originally posted by Element
You need a lot more aluminum to match the strength of steel, which invaribly increases both weight and price. Even if the aluminum part weighed less, it would be a lot larger. There was actually a good thread about that on Tech. Magnesium would be good, but if I remember correctly, that can mean some nasty fire if a wreck occurs, which would be a safety concern.
Cro-moly steel is where it's at, but you probably won't see much of that on a production car.
It would be larger uh? Tell that to the Corvette Team, Solsice/Sky team and even the Malibu team that uses aluminum control arms that are basic sizes and aren't any bigger than other suspension parts of other cars.
Element
03-18-2007, 11:40 PM
Originally posted by mrgto
It would be larger uh? Tell that to the Corvette Team, Solsice/Sky team and even the Malibu team that uses aluminum control arms that are basic sizes and aren't any bigger than other suspension parts of other cars.
The basic physics demands the parts are either weaker, or heavier.
MapleRed
03-19-2007, 12:45 AM
Originally posted by Checkmate
I took that as 3800 is the target. :shrug: We will see, in another year or so I guess. :(
What is the curb weight on the GTO, the real curb weight not what GM released.
I think someone in that thread said the Camaro would weigh over 3800 lbs and Scott refuted it and said "no way it weighs over 3800 lbs.". Nothing in that statement says that is some kind of target. I also don't believe Scott would reveal the curb weight, since he won't mention any hp numbers or engine details. Its just too early for him to reveal any kind of specific production info.
ChillPhatCat
03-19-2007, 01:07 AM
Originally posted by Element
The basic physics demands the parts are either weaker, or heavier.
Many aluminum alloys are stronger than standard issue steel and at a density of 1/3 that of steel, that means stronger and lighter. Steel's strength is overrated, it can mix easier with other metals and it's easy to work with but it's nowhere near a wonder metal. There are many things that make steel a better material, but pound for pound you just can't beat aluminum in the end. Ultimately, steel is just cheap and readilly available.
ULTIMTEORANGESS
03-19-2007, 01:13 AM
Originally posted by MapleRed
I think someone in that thread said the Camaro would weigh over 3800 lbs and Scott refuted it and said "no way it weighs over 3800 lbs.". Nothing in that statement says that is some kind of target. I also don't believe Scott would reveal the curb weight, since he won't mention any hp numbers or engine details. Its just too early for him to reveal any kind of specific production info.
lutz mentioned whn he was talking about a G8 that it had a chassis that shared platforms and it was designed for different wheelbase vehicles.
does that play a factor in vehicle weight?
Element
03-19-2007, 04:46 AM
Originally posted by ChillPhatCat
Many aluminum alloys are stronger than standard issue steel and at a density of 1/3 that of steel, that means stronger and lighter. Steel's strength is overrated, it can mix easier with other metals and it's easy to work with but it's nowhere near a wonder metal. There are many things that make steel a better material, but pound for pound you just can't beat aluminum in the end. Ultimately, steel is just cheap and readilly available.
I'd also imagine those aluminum alloys are significantly more expensive than steel, which is the real issue here. There is no reason for GM to use an exotic material (granted, aluminum alloy might not be "exotic" but for purposes here, it's close enough) on a standard-production family sedan.
mrgto
03-19-2007, 12:24 PM
Originally posted by Element
I'd also imagine those aluminum alloys are significantly more expensive than steel, which is the real issue here. There is no reason for GM to use an exotic material (granted, aluminum alloy might not be "exotic" but for purposes here, it's close enough) on a standard-production family sedan.
Uh, they already do on the Malibu....how many times do we have to tell you that?
426HEMI
03-19-2007, 09:08 PM
Odd, don't see anyone calling it an overweight pig.
ill deuce
03-19-2007, 09:36 PM
Originally posted by Element
The basic physics demands the parts are either weaker, or heavier. most steel parts are cast,the aluminum parts are probably forged.
that way they can be the same size,the foring would make up for the size difference
ill deuce
03-19-2007, 09:40 PM
Originally posted by ChillPhatCat
Many aluminum alloys are stronger than standard issue steel and at a density of 1/3 that of steel, that means stronger and lighter. Steel's strength is overrated, it can mix easier with other metals and it's easy to work with but it's nowhere near a wonder metal. There are many things that make steel a better material, but pound for pound you just can't beat aluminum in the end. Ultimately, steel is just cheap and readilly available. aluminum will never have the fatigue life steel will
thats the advantage of steel over,aluminum,magnesium,and titanium.certain forged alloys might match ceratin steel alloy's tensile strength but never the longevity
Kata Skopos
03-19-2007, 11:06 PM
Originally posted by 426HEMI
Odd, don't see anyone calling it an overweight pig.
its not a 2 door "sports car"
if it were then it certainly would be ;)
426HEMI
03-19-2007, 11:28 PM
Originally posted by needcash
its not a 2 door "sports car"
if it were then it certainly would be ;)
Oh I think there were plenty of comments made about the Chrysler 300 vehicles.
Element
03-20-2007, 02:26 AM
Originally posted by mrgto
Uh, they already do on the Malibu....how many times do we have to tell you that?
:Picard: Do you honestly think the same time and money went into developing aluminum components for the Malibu as the Z06? :boggled:
Kata Skopos
03-20-2007, 03:19 AM
Originally posted by 426HEMI
Oh I think there were plenty of comments made about the Chrysler 300 vehicles.
dont the 300s weigh over 4200lbs? thats a bit on the heavy side ;)
cm_ls1
03-20-2007, 03:48 AM
lets not forget .. the camaro will be on a shorter version of the zeta platform .. so should weigh less
and the gto should be longer.. with hopefully L92 6.2l geniv, l76 manifold and more aggressive cam and higher compression !
http://g8gt.com/attachments/276d1174358121-coupe-v.jpg
ill deuce
03-20-2007, 03:51 AM
Originally posted by needcash
dont the 300s weigh over 4200lbs? thats a bit on the heavy side ;) so 4200=fat pig
4000=:thumbup:
?
MapleRed
03-20-2007, 04:09 AM
Originally posted by 426HEMI
Oh I think there were plenty of comments made about the Chrysler 300 vehicles.
I think people are getting used to the fact that they weigh so much and its not such a big deal anymore. :shrug:
Cobra Commander
03-20-2007, 04:26 AM
It's a pig.
And Al is light, but iirc you can't weld on it.
ULTIMTEORANGESS
03-20-2007, 04:35 AM
Originally posted by cm_ls1
lets not forget .. the camaro will be on a shorter version of the zeta platform .. so should weigh less
and the gto should be longer.. with hopefully L92 6.2l geniv, l76 manifold and more aggressive cam and higher compression !
http://g8gt.com/attachments/276d1174358121-coupe-v.jpg
i think this anwsers my question from earlier.
shuck
03-20-2007, 05:01 AM
Originally posted by CT Morgan
Not with today's safety standards and consumer option requirements. :( 3,700 would only be 100 lbs heavier than the average f-body... no way in hell that's going to happen.
3600 lbs, damn did you have a the back seats full when you weight your car. Mine weighed in at 3392 lbs without driver and a 1/4 tank of gas.
mrgto
03-20-2007, 11:08 AM
Originally posted by Element
:Picard: Do you honestly think the same time and money went into developing aluminum components for the Malibu as the Z06? :boggled:
Does it matter? Aluminum isn't any kind of exotic metal. THey make a shit load of corvettes and solstice/Sky's and they are going to make the same amount of G8's so they should also get aluminum suspensions to help out in the fuel economcy standards. Hell, I've seen ford pickups with aluminum suspension components..they need heavy duty pieces right?
Harmon Rabb
03-20-2007, 02:33 PM
Originally posted by Darth Plagueis
It's a pig.
And Al is light, but iirc you can't weld on it.
of course it's a pig. it's a big 4-door.
you can weld aluminum ;)
Am I the only one who thinks the G8 looks a helluva lot like the TL?
Cobra Commander
03-20-2007, 06:33 PM
Originally posted by Berman
of course it's a pig. it's a big 4-door.
you can weld aluminum ;)
I said on it.
ie, a roll bar/cage
Kata Skopos
03-20-2007, 06:40 PM
Originally posted by ill deuce
so 4200=fat pig
4000=:thumbup:
?
over 4200 = fat pig
3900 = acceptable for a 4 door
thats right around CTS-V and M5 weights IIRC and the 300s are around mid size SUV weight :shrug: my jeep cherokee only weight 4000lbs :o
426HEMI
03-20-2007, 07:04 PM
Originally posted by needcash
over 4200 = fat pig
3900 = acceptable for a 4 door
thats right around CTS-V and M5 weights IIRC and the 300s are around mid size SUV weight :shrug: my jeep cherokee only weight 4000lbs :o
If the article is correct, G8 = 3995lbs. SRT-8 4160lbs. So 165lbs is THAT big of a deal? Bullshit.
Harmon Rabb
03-20-2007, 07:05 PM
Originally posted by 426HEMI
If the article is correct, G8 = 3995lbs. SRT-8 4160lbs. So 165lbs is THAT big of a deal? Bullshit.
don't you dare talk to the authority on all things automotive like that. :slap:
426HEMI
03-20-2007, 09:14 PM
Originally posted by Berman
don't you dare talk to the authority on all things automotive like that. :slap:
All things related to cawk maybe. :bwahaha:
Kata Skopos
03-20-2007, 09:47 PM
Originally posted by 426HEMI
If the article is correct, G8 = 3995lbs. SRT-8 4160lbs. So 165lbs is THAT big of a deal? Bullshit.
nope, i thought it was different :shrug:
if it makes you feel better i dont like the idea of 4000lbs either :badpost:
Cobra Commander
03-20-2007, 10:10 PM
165 is indeed a big deal
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.